1) Bibliographic Data
Weaver, Thomas. (2001) “Time, Space, and Articulation in the Economic
Development of the U.S.-Mexico Border Region from 1940 to 2000”,
Human Organization, V. 60-2, Summer:105-20
2) Question(s) addressed by the author and working arguments
The following topics are reviewed as commodities and articulatory mechanisms:
agricultural development, urbanization, labor, the retail and tourism industries
and the contraband trade, and the establishment of the Border Industrialization
Program.
This essay applies World-System concepts to the analyses of the U.S.-Mexico
border region. The binational border region, for example, shares characteristics
of periphery and semiperiphery. These linked regions transform labor and
resources into economic activity. The world economy is made up of “commodity
chains”-forward and backward connections in the processing of a commodity
within regions. These commodity chains encompass the exploitation of raw
materials, labor reproduction, levels of processing, transportation, and
consumption. The capitalist world-system in this context forces unequal
exchange that simultaneously promotes core development and peripheral poverty
and dependence. The collaboration of elite classes between and within core
and periphery supports this transformation.
3) Conceptual references to transnational-transnationalism
Transnationalized,
transnational interests.
4) Conclusions or Final Remarks
The author views articulations as mechanisms that facilitate the movement
of capital and value from one part of the world-system to another. The
use is similar to “mediating institutions” used by Lamphere
(1992) and Hackenberg (1997). Hegemony or hegemonic cycles refers to
the ascendance to dominance by one nation-state in periods that last
100 or more years. This has occurred with he Dutch, Great Britain and
the United States. The hegemonic power dictates how the periphery responds
because it controls economic activities such as finance, distribution,
and consumption.
The author concludes: Is the process of migration the articulation or
are the agents of this process the articulatory mechanism? The answer
is both. At one level we can say that migration is an institution and
process and an articulatory mechanism. At another level of abstraction,
the agents of migration-labor contractors, coyotes, guides, employers,
return migrants, and social networks- are also mechanisms.
|